Tuesday, 4 June 2019

UASB Process


Introduction To UASB - Process
The heart of the UASB system is the anaerobic reactor based on Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket process. The reactor consists of a large corrosion resistant tank which incorporates a unique 3‑phase settler called as GLSS, to separate the sludge, biogas and effluent. The settler is located at the top of the reactor and is designed for specific COD reactor loadings and hydraulic throughput.

A flow distribution network is located at the base of the reactor.  This network is designed to distribute the flow evenly  throughout the bottom of the reactor.  This eliminates short ‑ circuiting and promotes the proper formation of the  sludge flocs which is a critical factor in reactor operation.  The distribution network is designed to facilitate easy cleaning, thereby eliminating potential plugging problems.

New bacterial cells formed in the reactor aggregate into tiny flocs with extremely good settling characteristics.  The biogas produced by the bacteria in the form of small bubbles rises upward through the sludge bed / blanket zones and provides a natural mixing action.  When the biogas reaches the top of the reactor, it is removed by gas collectors.  A gas‑free zone above the collector makes possible the settling of finely dispersed solids to the reactor bottom.

SALIENT  FEATURES OF  THE UASB  PROCESS
·         High treatment efficiency in terms of BOD & COD reductions in single stage
·         Very low or practically nil energy requirements
·         Ability to withstand organic and hydraulic shock loadings
·         Low nutrient requirements
·         Production of Biogas with high percentage of methane which can be converted into an useful energy resource viz. Heat, Electricity, etc.
·         Low space requirements due to higher organic loading rates
·         It is a high rate process i.e. It can operate at high volumetric loading
·         Low  production of stabilized excess sludge with very good dewatering characteristics
·         Low operation / maintenance costs since very few moving parts 
·         Sludge can be stored for extended periods of time (bacteria go dormant)
ADVANTAGES OF THE UASB PROCESS OVER CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS

The “ UASB ” process has been recognized and accepted world wide as the “ Most Cost Effective ” process, due to following direct and inherent advantages, as compared to traditional conventional system i.e. Activated Sludge Process :

¨      Higher efficiency and working results.
¨      Compact reactor, hence space reduced to a large extent.
¨      Very low power consumption (mainly required for feed pumps only).
¨      Stable process
¨      Production of stabilized excess sludge is low with very good dewatering characteristics.

¨      Low nutrient requirement, as bacteria retain Nitrogen & Phosphorus and there is no destruction of cells.

¨      Resistant to shock loadings
¨      Methane rich biogas is produced as a by-product which can be effectively used either for domestic or industrial purposes. 

¨      Volumetric loading rate is high. .
¨      In case of power failure or long shut down, the bacteria go into dormant stage and plant can be restarted to take full load within short period.

¨      Since the anaerobic digestion takes place in a closed reactor, there is no foul smell in surrounding area and in the vicinity of E.T.P.  Further, the nuisance due to flies, mosquitoes etc, is totally eliminated.

¨      “UASB” process eliminates large number of pumps / blowers / aerators etc. hence operating and maintenance cost reduces to a large extent.

The system proposed by us has many advantages over the Conventional Activated sludge treatment scheme. These are as follows:
  1. The total capital cost of UASB followed by Extended aeration is substantially less than the Conventional Activated sludge process.
  2. The operating electrical power requirement of the UASB + Extended Aeration is about 50% of that of the conventional ASP.
  3. The excess sludge generation in the UASB + Extended Aeration is negligible as compared to the conventional ASP.

No comments:

Post a Comment